[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: arizona: Make logging of FLL calculations clearer

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:39:32PM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> On 24/02/16 04:08, Mark Brown wrote:

> >I think that stuff was originally based on the way the datasheets quote
> >things:

> >>-	arizona_fll_dbg(fll, "FRATIO=%x(%d) OUTDIV=%x REFCLK_DIV=%x\n",
> >the hex(decimal) but there is certainly very familiar from some of
> >those.

> Indeed, and it was fine on the first codec. Now we've got various revisions
> of the FLL with some fields having different meanings, human error started
> to creep into interpreting the debug.

I'm not saying it's a bad idea to change it, just pointing out where
it's likely to have come from (and the fact that the way the datasheets
were writing this was always a bit weird).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20160225/54112f0f/attachment-0001.sig>