[alsa-devel] [PATCH v2] ALSA: hda: when comparing pin configurations, ignore assoc in addition to seq

[Kai-Heng Feng]

Commit [64047d7f4912 ALSA: hda - ignore the assoc and seq when comparing
pin configurations] intented to ignore both seq and assoc at pin
comparing, but it only ignored seq. So that commit may still fail to
match pins on some machines.
Change the bitmask to also ignore assoc.

v2: Use macro to do bit masking.

Thanks to Hui Wang for the analysis.

Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng at canonical.com>
---
 sound/pci/hda/hda_auto_parser.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_auto_parser.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_auto_parser.c
index 4ad29f8..a03cf68 100644
--- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_auto_parser.c
+++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_auto_parser.c
@@ -884,6 +884,8 @@ void snd_hda_apply_fixup(struct hda_codec *codec, int action)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_hda_apply_fixup);
 
+#define IGNORE_SEQ_ASSOC (~(AC_DEFCFG_SEQUENCE | AC_DEFCFG_DEF_ASSOC))
+
 static bool pin_config_match(struct hda_codec *codec,
 			     const struct hda_pintbl *pins)
 {
@@ -901,7 +903,7 @@ static bool pin_config_match(struct hda_codec *codec,
 		for (; t_pins->nid; t_pins++) {
 			if (t_pins->nid == nid) {
 				found = 1;
-				if ((t_pins->val & 0xfffffff0) == (cfg & 0xfffffff0))
+				if ((t_pins->val & IGNORE_SEQ_ASSOC) == (cfg & IGNORE_SEQ_ASSOC))
 					break;
 				else if ((cfg & 0xf0000000) == 0x40000000 && (t_pins->val & 0xf0000000) == 0x40000000)
 					break;
-- 
2.10.2