[alsa-devel] [PATCH 1240/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

[Baole Ni]

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni at intel.com>
---
 sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c b/sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c
index 8b8e2e5..b640978 100644
--- a/sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c
+++ b/sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c
@@ -44,11 +44,11 @@ static int index[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_IDX;
 static char *id[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_STR;
 static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP;
 
-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for Digigram LX6464ES interface.");
-module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for  Digigram LX6464ES interface.");
-module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable/disable specific Digigram LX6464ES soundcards.");
 
 static const char card_name[] = "LX6464ES";
-- 
2.9.2