[alsa-devel] [PATCH - alsa-lib 1/1] Change card/pid get functions to return -ENOSYS if the kernel is too old
Takashi Iwai
tiwai at suse.de
Fri Apr 8 15:10:27 CEST 2016
On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:56:28 +0200,
Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
>
> Dne 8.4.2016 v 12:24 Takashi Iwai napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 22:10:41 +0200,
> > Martin Koegler wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 03:23:01PM -0400, Adam Goode wrote:
> >>> Have you heard any objections?
> >>>
> >>> Also, would you plan to do a 1.1.2 release soon after accepting this, to
> >>> get this functionality out quickly?
> >>
> >> Distributions already start to pick 1.1.1 up:
> >> https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/382608
> >> https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/382611
> >>
> >> I would object merging that patch, if there is no immediate patched 1.1.2 release available,
> >> as otherwise 1.1.1 with a different API will get used by the mass.
> >
> > I have no strong opinion on this, so far. Either way (a quick 1.1.2
> > fix release, or introducing a new function in 1.1.2) isn't a big
> > deal. Maybe the former is easier, but the latter is safer.
> >
> > Jaroslav, what's your take?
> > (And no, let's not use the versioned symbols again :)
>
> What about 1.1.1.2 ?
Do you mean 1.1.1.1? It's already confusing, as you see :)
> This + "pcm_plugin: fix appl pointer not correct
> when mmap_commit() return error" patch ?
If you don't mind a quick release, we may do it, yes, no matter which
version number is.
But, meanwhile, I thought of the change again, and now wonder whether
it's really right to return an error *and* -1. -1 conflicts with
EPERM. And I thought there is no POSIX definition of error numbers,
so in theory, -ENOSYS may be -1.
thanks,
Takashi
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list