[alsa-devel] Packages 1.0.30 - release pending

[Lin, Mengdong]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaroslav Kysela [mailto:perex at perex.cz]
> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 9:13 PM
> To: Mengdong Lin; Lin, Mengdong; Liam Girdwood
> Cc: Takashi Iwai; Koul, Vinod; ALSA development
> Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] Packages 1.0.30 - release pending
> 
> Dne 5.11.2015 v 14:04 Mengdong Lin napsal(a):
> > On 11/05/2015 11:08 AM, Lin, Mengdong wrote:
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Liam Girdwood [mailto:liam.r.girdwood at linux.intel.com]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:17 AM
> >>> To: Jaroslav Kysela
> >>> Cc: Lin, Mengdong; Takashi Iwai; Koul, Vinod; ALSA development
> >>> Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] Packages 1.0.30 - release pending
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 15:29 +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> >>>> Dne 28.10.2015 v 16:06 Lin, Mengdong napsal(a):
> >>>>
> >>>>> I expect the other kernel and user space patches will be submitted
> >>>>> next week
> >>> after the internal review.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any progress for the user space? If I don't receive the updates for
> >>>> the user space packages until Friday CEST morning, I'll release
> >>>> 1.1.0 without them. We can release 1.1.1 quickly when all things
> >>>> are finished for the topology code. The distributions can adapt to
> >>>> new tools (like
> >>>> alsatplg) in 1.1.0 and then just receive the updated code (1.1.1).
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> It's all going through internal review and testing now. Mengdong can
> >>> probably post to the list tomorrow if all is OK, otherwise we can go for
> 1.1.1.
> >
> > I've sent out the alsa-lib patches for topology ABI update. Please
> > review.The thread name is "topology: Align ABI with kernel to version 4".
> >
> > All ABI updates have been merged in sound kernel except this one:
> > topology: ABI - Rename dai_elems to pcm_elems in manifest This patch
> > is still in ASoC kernel, topic/topology branch.
> 
> I did a quick review and I've no issue with it.
> 
> Takashi, any comments to include these patches ?
> 
> Lin, do we need a change to the topology utility in alsa-utils ?

No. There is no need to change the topology utility in alsa-utils.

Thanks for your and Takashi's review!

Regards
Mengdong