[alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: fix missing machine device creation

[Vinod Koul]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:29:02PM +0800, Keyon wrote:
> >I'm having a hard time seeing the difference between this and what's
> >going on in sst-acpi.  They seem to be doing the same thing in slightly
> >different ways, they both match tables of CODEC IDs to machine driver
> >names with the distinction being that this doesn't provide a firmware
> >filename whereas sst-acpi does but the mechanics of mapping a CODEC to a
> >machine driver seem otherwise the same.
> 
> agree that it may be better if we can reuse(or merge with) sst
> driver (intel/common/sst-acpi.c) for SKL.

all drivers use different sst_machine structure... and data required is not
same

-- 
~Vinod