[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ALSA: firewire-lib: fix compare_const_fl.cocci warnings

[Julia Lawall]

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:

> Hi Julia,
>
> On Nov 02 2015 16:20, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Nov 02 2015 15:55, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > Move constant to the right of binary operators.
> > > >
> > > > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/compare_const_fl.cocci
> > > >
> > > > CC: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi at sakamocchi.jp>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu at intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall at lip6.fr>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Depends on personal taste, but the modified version does look a little
> > > > nicer to me, since one can better see the relationship between the fdf
> > > > and sfc fields.
> > > >
> > > >    amdtp-am824.c |    2 +-
> > > >    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > --- a/sound/firewire/amdtp-am824.c
> > > > +++ b/sound/firewire/amdtp-am824.c
> > > > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ int amdtp_am824_set_parameters(struct am
> > > >    	if (err < 0)
> > > >    		return err;
> > > >
> > > > -	s->fdf = AMDTP_FDF_AM824 | s->sfc;
> > > > +	s->fdf = s->sfc | AMDTP_FDF_AM824;
> > > >
> > > >    	/*
> > > >    	 * In IEC 61883-6, one data block represents one event. In
> > > > ALSA, one
> > >
> > > Could I request explainations about the advantage of this modification? I
> > > cannot imagine good reasons for this subtle changes...
> >
> > I put the reason under the --- (better see the relationship between fdf
> > and sfc).  But if you think the code makes more sense as it is, just
> > ignore the patch.
>
> Mmm. I'm sorry but I'm not wiling to add 'Reviewed-by' tag to this patch
> because the reason is non-functional and personal.

OK, no problem.

julia