[alsa-devel] writing an alsa driver
Liam Girdwood
liam.r.girdwood at linux.intel.com
Thu May 28 13:31:08 CEST 2015
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 22:13 +0200, Michele Curti wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 07:41:56PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > And dmesg tells me:
> > > > > [ +1.386847] rt5645 i2c-10EC5648:00: Failed to reguest IRQ: -22
> > > > > [ +0.000102] rt5645 i2c-10EC5648:00: Fail gpio_request hp_det_gpio
> > > > > [ +0.000094] rt5645 i2c-10EC5648:00: Fail gpio_direction hp_det_gpio
> >
> > Looks like the codec has no platform data and is failing to get a valid
> > IRQ number. Do you know what IRQ the code is actually requesting as it
> > could be bogus ?
>
> The IRQ was indeed -1, using the latest linux-next the IRQ is now 146, so I'll
> keep using linux-next for my tests. The gpio requested is 0.
>
GPIO is 0 because there is no platform data coming form the codec ACPI
data. This may have to be defined as a quirk in the codec driver. Bard
any suggestion here for the HP detect GPIOs ?
> >
> > Ok, lets get the dev_dbg() output enabled for sst-baytrail*.c and we can
> > take it from there.
>
> Sure, these new lines appeared:
>
> [ 1.515886] baytrail-pcm-audio baytrail-pcm-audio: initialising Byt DSP IPC
> [ 1.519619] baytrail-pcm-audio baytrail-pcm-audio: header sign=$SST\xffffffb4^M^D size=0x40db4 modules=0x1 fmt=0x100 size=32
>
That means FW file format is good.
> [ 2.000642] byt-rt5645 byt-rt5645: ASoC: CPU DAI baytrail-pcm-audio not registered
We are seeing a lot of these. Can you confirm whether this driver has
probed ? If not can you see it's ACPI ID listed
under /sys/bus/acpi/devices.
If it's not probing, it may also have a different ACPI ID compared to
the reference driver. You may have to add an entry to sst-acpi.c i.e.
static struct sst_acpi_mach baytrail_machines[] = {
{ "10EC5640", "byt-rt5640", "intel/fw_sst_0f28.bin-48kHz_i2s_master" },
{ "193C9890", "byt-max98090", "intel/fw_sst_0f28.bin-48kHz_i2s_master" },
{}
};
Liam
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list