[alsa-devel] [PATCH 10/14] ASoC: wm8904: Fix wrong value references for boolean kctl

[Takashi Iwai]

The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.

Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
index d3b3f57668cc..215e93c1ddf0 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static int wm8904_get_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_soc_kcontrol_codec(kcontrol);
 	struct wm8904_priv *wm8904 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
 
-	ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = wm8904->deemph;
+	ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = wm8904->deemph;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int wm8904_put_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 {
 	struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_soc_kcontrol_codec(kcontrol);
 	struct wm8904_priv *wm8904 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
-	int deemph = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
+	int deemph = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
 
 	if (deemph > 1)
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.3.2