[alsa-devel] Intel SST on a Bay Trail tablet

[Antonio Ospite]

On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:20:46 +0530
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 03:46:13PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:06:27PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
[...]
> > > 
> > > Which makes me thinking how does those strings describe the SSP port
> > > setup? E.g. do they reflect what port is actually used or could it
> > > be possible that those are just driver strings but firmware could
> > > have been tuned for SSP0? If I looked at earlier right, Teclast has
> > > the low pin-count Baytrail without SSP2 but I'm not sure about that.
> > The FW doesnt provide way to changes ports from driver in this, so this
> > doesnt mean much. If we are sure it is not ssp2, I can provide ssp1 fw for
> > test
> I ahve pushed latest BYT version we have as well as added binary for second
> SSP port. Please give it a try:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/firmware.git/commit/?h=byt&id=28ff420dd33ec299217bad7d526ff3bfd163b551
> 

Thanks Vinod, but I see these are in the ELF format, and the mainline
driver does not support this format, at least the last time I checked it
didn't.

Ciao,
   Antonio

-- 
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?