[alsa-devel] ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Choose PCM driver based on configured DMA controller
Jyri Sarha
jsarha at ti.com
Thu Jun 11 21:05:26 CEST 2015
On 06/11/15 18:06, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Jyri Sarha,
>
> The patch 9fbd58cf4ab0: "ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Choose PCM driver based
> on configured DMA controller" from Jun 2, 2015, leads to the
> following static checker warning:
>
> sound/soc/davinci/davinci-mcasp.c:1842 davinci_mcasp_probe()
> info: ignoring unreachable code.
>
> sound/soc/davinci/davinci-mcasp.c
> 1812 switch (ret) {
> 1813 case PCM_EDMA:
> 1814 #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_SND_EDMA_SOC) || \
> 1815 (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_SND_DAVINCI_SOC_MCASP) && \
> 1816 IS_MODULE(CONFIG_SND_EDMA_SOC))
> 1817 ret = edma_pcm_platform_register(&pdev->dev);
> 1818 #else
> 1819 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing SND_EDMA_SOC\n");
> 1820 ret = -EINVAL;
> 1821 goto err;
> 1822 #endif
> 1823 break;
> 1824 case PCM_SDMA:
> 1825 #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_SND_OMAP_SOC) || \
> 1826 (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_SND_DAVINCI_SOC_MCASP) && \
> 1827 IS_MODULE(CONFIG_SND_OMAP_SOC))
> 1828 ret = omap_pcm_platform_register(&pdev->dev);
> 1829 #else
> 1830 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing SND_SDMA_SOC\n");
> 1831 ret = -EINVAL;
> 1832 goto err;
> 1833 #endif
> 1834 break;
> 1835 default:
> 1836 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No DMA controller found (%d)\n", ret);
> 1837 case -EPROBE_DEFER:
> 1838 goto err;
> 1839 break;
> 1840 }
> 1841
>
> Depending on the ifdefs then this is reachable, I guess...
Yes it is. I could remove the "goto err;" from #else branches to silence
the warning. That would cause a double error print for a single issue...
either way is Ok by me.
Best regards,
Jyri
>
> 1842 if (ret) {
> 1843 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "register PCM failed: %d\n", ret);
> 1844 goto err;
> 1845 }
> 1846
> 1847 return 0;
> 1848
> 1849 err:
> 1850 pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> 1851 return ret;
> 1852 }
> 1853
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list