[alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Add functions for DSP module configuration
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Wed Jul 29 19:56:31 CEST 2015
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:20:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:33:23PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > +static int skl_alloc_queue(struct skl_module_pin *mpin,
> > > + struct skl_module_inst_id id, int max)
> > > +{
> > > + struct skl_module_pin m_pin = skl_get_queue(mpin, id, max);
> > > +
> > > + if (m_pin.pin_index < 0)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (m_pin.is_dynamic) {
> > > + m_pin.in_use = true;
> > > + m_pin.id.module_id = id.module_id;
> > > + m_pin.id.instance_id = id.instance_id;
> > > + }
> > Double indentation here. It's really unclear to me why a static pin
> > doesn't need to get merked as in use?
> Oops, will fix
> In static pin case, the pins come from topology binary where these are fixed
> for a configuration, so don't need to be allocated thus marked and hence
> freed.
But isn't this also protecting against attempts to use the resource
multiple times within the configuration (or shouldn't we be doing that)?
Please bear in mind that this stuff has basically zero documentation or
explanation so I'm kind of guessing as to what this is supposed to do.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20150729/768b9056/attachment.sig>
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list