[alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] ASoC: rt5645: Simplify rt5645_enable_push_button_irq
Bard Liao
bardliao at realtek.com
Wed Jul 15 15:03:14 CEST 2015
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie at kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 7:57 PM
> To: Nicolas Boichat
> Cc: Bard Liao; Oder Chiou; Liam Girdwood; Jaroslav Kysela; Takashi Iwai;
> alsa-devel at alsa-project.org; koro.chen at mediatek.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ASoC: rt5645: Simplify
> rt5645_enable_push_button_irq
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 07:50:50PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
>
> > > Thanks for the review. I think what we need is something like
> > > + snd_soc_dapm_force_enable_pin(dapm, "ADC L
> power");
> > > + snd_soc_dapm_force_enable_pin(dapm, "ADC R
> power");
> > > + snd_soc_dapm_sync(dapm);
> > > + if (!codec->component.card->instantiated) {
> > > + regmap_update_bits(rt5645->regmap,
> RT5645_PWR_DIG1,
> > > + RT5645_PWR_ADC_L_BIT |
> RT5645_PWR_ADC_R_BIT,
> > > + RT5645_PWR_ADC_L_BIT |
> RT5645_PWR_ADC_R_BIT);
> > > + }
>
> > Just to make sure I understand... With the code above, the dapm state
> > is consistent. However, DAPM will only set the regmap bits when the
> > card is instantiated. So why do we still need to update the regmap? To
> > make sure we do not miss an early jack/button event? Or would we still
> > get jack irq if the pins are enabled a little later? (I guess we can
> > live with missing a button event at that stage, but we need the jack
> > state to be correct)
>
> I'm assuming it's something to do with early detection, I don't really know
> though.
>
I think the problem is dapm won't update the bits if card is not
instantiated. And those bits are necessary for the jack or button
detect functions. Without these bits, we may not get irq properly.
That's why we need to update those bits manually.
>
> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list