[alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Revert "ASoC: wm8996: Pass the IRQF_ONESHOT flag"

[Axel Lin]

2015-07-09 2:34 GMT+08:00 Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:29:01PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>> This reverts ed043aebe6ec ("ASoC: wm8996: Pass the IRQF_ONESHOT flag").
>
> Please use subject lines reflecting the style for the subsystem, even
> for reverts.

I don't get it.
I thought if a patch is actually a revert, it should look like a revert.
So I generate the patch by "git revert". Is that wrong?