[alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 07/13] topology: Add private data parser
Takashi Iwai
tiwai at suse.de
Tue Jul 7 18:19:57 CEST 2015
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 17:54:02 +0200,
Liam Girdwood wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 18:20 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> >
> > > +static int get_hex_num(const char *str)
> > > +{
> > > + char *tmp, *s = NULL;
> > > + int i = 0;
> > > +
> > > + tmp = strdup(str);
> > > + if (tmp == NULL)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + s = strtok(tmp, ",");
> > > + while (s != NULL) {
> > > + s = strtok(NULL, ",");
> > > + i++;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + free(tmp);
> > > + return i;
> >
> > Hmm, this just counts the number of comma + 1, so you don't need to
> > duplicate the string?
> >
>
> The string here is duplicated since strtok is destructive (it overwrites
> the delimiters with NULL) and the string is being used later on by the
> calling function.
Yes, but what I meant is something like below:
static int get_hex_num(const char *str)
{
int i = 0;
if (!*str)
return 0;
for (;;) {
i++;
str = strchr(str, ',');
if (!str)
return i;
str++;
}
}
... so that it works without strdup().
But it seems that strtok() skips the starting delimiter or handles
multiple delimiters as a single, so the result will become
inconsistent. That is, all the following strings will give "a" and
"b" via strtok():
a,b
a,,b
,a,b
a,b,
I guess you don't want to have an empty list element, right?
Takashi
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list