[alsa-devel] [PATCH v3] ASoC: wm8960: update pll and clock setting function
Charles Keepax
ckeepax at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Mon Aug 10 10:32:46 CEST 2015
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 04:41:00PM +0800, Zidan Wang wrote:
> Add sysclk auto mode. When it's sysclk auto mode, if the MCLK is
> available for clock configure, using MCLK to provide sysclk directly,
> otherwise, search a available pll out frequcncy and set pll.
>
> Configure clock in hw_params may cause problems when using bypass style
> paths without hw_params in machine driver getting called. So add configure
> clock to set_bias_level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zidan Wang <zidan.wang at freescale.com>
> ---
<snip>
> @@ -711,6 +785,9 @@ static int wm8960_set_bias_level_out3(struct snd_soc_codec *codec,
> case SND_SOC_BIAS_PREPARE:
> switch (snd_soc_codec_get_bias_level(codec)) {
> case SND_SOC_BIAS_STANDBY:
> + ret = wm8960_configure_clocking(codec);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
Is it right that we are calling wm8960_configure_clocking before
clk_prepare_enable? As configure_clocking will enable the clocks
shouldn't mclk be available before then?
> if (!IS_ERR(wm8960->mclk)) {
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(wm8960->mclk);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -726,6 +803,13 @@ static int wm8960_set_bias_level_out3(struct snd_soc_codec *codec,
> break;
>
> case SND_SOC_BIAS_ON:
> + /*
> + * If it's sysclk auto mode, and the pll is enabled,
> + * disable the pll
> + */
> + if (wm8960->clk_id == WM8960_SYSCLK_AUTO && (pm2 & 0x1))
> + wm8960_set_pll(codec, 0, 0);
> +
> if (!IS_ERR(wm8960->mclk))
> clk_disable_unprepare(wm8960->mclk);
> break;
> @@ -780,6 +864,7 @@ static int wm8960_set_bias_level_capless(struct snd_soc_codec *codec,
> enum snd_soc_bias_level level)
> {
> struct wm8960_priv *wm8960 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
> + u16 pm2 = snd_soc_read(codec, WM8960_POWER2);
> int reg, ret;
>
> switch (level) {
> @@ -822,6 +907,10 @@ static int wm8960_set_bias_level_capless(struct snd_soc_codec *codec,
>
> msleep(100);
>
> + ret = wm8960_configure_clocking(codec);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
Ditto here.
Other than that I think this looks ok to me.
Thanks,
Charles
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list