[alsa-devel] Too many snd_pcm_mmap_readi calls

Jan Homann jh at janhomann.de
Wed May 7 09:18:48 CEST 2014


Hi ALSA-Dev-List

I am very new to all this ALSA-Dev-stuff. For a few decades I have been
just an alsa user but now i try to develop a tiny sound recorder like
millions or thousands did before.
On the recorder there is a small while-loop for capturing the pcm data,
encode them and send them to a server every 10ms. On my desktop-pc and
on a Freescale i.mx 233 (ARMv5) the recorder is working quite well.
Now i run into a problem where the recorder is using all the cpu-time on
the arm-device for a few minutes. I tried to debug this behaviour
without any luck. Next i tried to trace the problem and removed as many
calls as possible and put a "gettimeofday" between every remaining call.
Here is the remaining code:
while(1) {

    sleep(1);
    gettimeofday(&time1,NULL);

    snd_pcm_wait( pcm_handle, REC_BUFFER_ELEMENT_SIZE_MS + 10);
    gettimeofday(&time2,NULL);

    snd_pcm_mmap_begin(pcm_handle, &my_areas, &offset, &frames);
    gettimeofday(&time2,NULL);

    snd_pcm_avail_update ( pcm_handle );
    gettimeofday(&time2,NULL);

    snd_pcm_mmap_readi( pcm_handle, network_data.data_UC, ALSA_READ_FRAMES);
    gettimeofday(&time3,NULL);

    snd_pcm_mmap_commit(pcm_handle, offset, frames);
    gettimeofday(&time4,NULL);
}

This is the output from strace:

0.001062 [401b418c] nanosleep({1, 0}, 0xbebd017c) = 0
1.001190 [401a4dac] gettimeofday({1399380864, 459211}, NULL) = 0
0.001032 [401de46c] ioctl(3, SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_SYNC_PTR, 0x4e1b0) = 0
0.002780 [401a4dac] gettimeofday({1399380864, 463023}, NULL) = 0
0.001063 [401a4dac] gettimeofday({1399380864, 464086}, NULL) = 0
0.001031 [401de46c] ioctl(3, SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_SYNC_PTR, 0x4e1b0) = 0
0.000968 [401a4dac] gettimeofday({1399380864, 466085}, NULL) = 0
0.001032 [401de46c] ioctl(3, SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_SYNC_PTR, 0x4e1b0) = 0
0.000968 [401de46c] ioctl(3, SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_SYNC_PTR, 0x4e1b0) = 0
0.000969 [401de46c] ioctl(3, SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_SYNC_PTR, 0x4e1b0) = 0
0.001000 [401de46c] ioctl(3, SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_SYNC_PTR, 0x4e1b0) = 0
0.002249 [401a4dac] gettimeofday({1399380864, 472678}, NULL) = 0
0.001438 [401a4dac] gettimeofday({1399380864, 473740}, NULL) = 0
0.001031 [40149518] rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [CHLD], [], 8) = 0
0.001218 [40149400] rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, NULL, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, 8) = 0
0.001562 [40149518] rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
0.001032 [401b418c] nanosleep({1, 0}, ^CProcess 14219 detached

As you can see, the output starts with the sleep. I just added the sleep
to find my loop-start in the trace-outpus.
Before every gettimeofday there is one call to a snd_pcm-function (ok,
besides the sleep).
There is a block of four ioctl calls between the fourth and the fifth
gettimeofday. This sould be the sound_pcm_mmap_readi.
In the while loop there is only one call to sound_pcm_mmap_read and on
my desktop-pc trace even shows only one call to sound_pcm_mmap_readi.

Maybe anyone can explain to me why the function is called that often on
the arm-device?
Maybe you can give some hints on what to check for the high cpu utilization?

Any hints would be kindly appreciated.

Thanks in advance,
Jan Homann


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list