[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: tegra: Use flat regcache.

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:39:30AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 03/18/2014 11:33 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:

> >Right.  OTOH, it's still better than papering over with GFP_ATOMIC, I
> >think.  We can just give a proper note in the function description,
> >for example.

> We should still hold the log over the _regmap_write portion of
> regmap_register_patch(), but I think we should otherwise be fine if we make
> it a API requirement that the caller needs to make sure that
> regmap_register_patch() is not called concurrently to itself or to
> regcache_sync().

Yes, it's just the (re)alloc I was talking about there.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20140318/aef2ae51/attachment-0001.sig>