[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: io: Remove hw_read() operation
Lars-Peter Clausen
lars at metafoo.de
Tue Mar 4 12:25:59 CET 2014
On 03/04/2014 11:11 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:45:47AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>
>> Yea, but we are not in a hurry. My plan was to get all the small
>
> YM "yes". :)
>
>> independent driver cleanups necessary for componetization merged for
>> 3.15 and then for 3.16 do the componetnization in the ASoC core.
>
> I'm keen to avoid getting lots of people sitting on unmerged patches,
> it's a risk source due to interaction issues.
>
>> So what the patchset does is add a regmap pointer to the component
>> struct. For now it also adds
>> snd_soc_component_{read,write,update_bits,
>> update_bits_async} wrapper functions which have the same signature
>> as the matching regmap function. Internally it does check if the
>> regmap field of the component is set, if yes, just forwards the call
>> to the matching regmap function. If not it falls back to the read,
>> write callbacks setup by CODEC or platform drivers. Once every
>> driver has been converted to regmap we can remove the fallback and
>> make the function static inline.
>
> Yes, that's what I'd expect and roughly what I was suggesting doing
> anyway inside the existing implementation (ie, not the new function
> but making the edit inside the existing functions).
>
> I'm not sure I like the _component_ naming since it's getting a bit
> verbose, but on the other hand it probably should only be the core
> using this stuff (the drivers ought to be able to find their own
> regmaps, or at least doing the same lookup) so probably it doesn't
> matter terribly much.
>
Yes, it's only used in the core. There is still snd_soc_write(codec) and
friends which wraps them like snd_soc_component_write(&codec->component).
But on the long run I'd like to see all snd_soc_writes be removed from
driver code.
- Lars
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list