[alsa-devel] [PATCH 4/4 v2] regulator: arizona-ldo1: Do not control clocking from regulator

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 05:29:22PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 04:53:37PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:

> > Whilst there are two things controlling it for a couple of
> > patches they both set the same value one after another, so it
> > should be safe. If it goes into the first patch nothing is
> > controlling the DVFS for a few patches so that actually creates a
> > bisection issue. It could be squashed into the second last patch
> > but this way feels cleaner?

> Although looking at that again it can happily merge into the
> second patch in the series so I will do that.

OK, or if you do want to leave them separate I'd suggest noting why it's
safe in the commit log.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20140623/8295d8ee/attachment.sig>