[alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: s3c64xx/smartq: use dynamic registration
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Thu Jul 17 13:05:40 CEST 2014
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:41:23PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:17:23AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Not so sure about that - what about requesting GPIOs for a bidirectional
> > bus? Thinking about SPI bitbanging here.
> Wouldn't you want to use a different means that the gpiod_array_*() API
> to handle those cases? gpiod_array_*() is probably most useful to handle
> bulk operations on a set of GPIOs that do essentially the same thing. If
> you get and then need to index into that array to handle them all
> differently then you don't gain very much.
For set and get, sure - but it's still useful to be able to do bulk
requests for GPIOs especially since that's the only bit of the interface
that requires error handling.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20140717/c32114b8/attachment.sig>
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list