[alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: s3c64xx/smartq: use dynamic registration

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:55:36PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:

> Right. It may very well be that a single flag specifier (as opposed to
> an array) will be enough for this case. If you need to request some
> GPIOs as input and some other as output then they are clearly
> different functions and requesting them together would be an abuse of
> the API.

Not so sure about that - what about requesting GPIOs for a bidirectional
bus?  Thinking about SPI bitbanging here.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20140717/d8637095/attachment.sig>