[alsa-devel] [patch] ALSA: bits vs bytes bug in snd_card_create()

walter harms wharms at bfs.de
Thu Jan 23 10:27:18 CET 2014



Am 23.01.2014 10:02, schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> At Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:55:31 +0100,
> walter harms wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 23.01.2014 09:21, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
>>> The test here is intended intended to prevent shift wrapping bugs when
>>> we do "1U << idx2".  We should consider the number of bits in a u32
>>> instead of the number of bytes.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 7bb2491b35a2 ('ALSA: Add kconfig to specify the max card numbers')
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> WARNING:  Please check this one carefully because I might be wrong.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/sound/core/init.c b/sound/core/init.c
>>> index 1351f22f651c..e9e3db321e64 100644
>>> --- a/sound/core/init.c
>>> +++ b/sound/core/init.c
>>> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ int snd_card_create(int idx, const char *xid,
>>>  	if (idx < 0) {
>>>  		for (idx2 = 0; idx2 < SNDRV_CARDS; idx2++) {
>>>  			/* idx == -1 == 0xffff means: take any free slot */
>>> -			if (idx2 < sizeof(int) && !(idx & (1U << idx2)))
>>> +			if (idx2 < 32 && !(idx & (1U << idx2)))
>>>  				continue;
>>>  			if (!test_bit(idx2, snd_cards_lock)) {
>>>  				if (!slots[idx2] || !*slots[idx2]) {
>>> --
>>
>> Funny bug,
>> to be 100% sure you could multiply by CHAR_BIT ;)
>>
>> other code simple does (1UL << (nr & 31))
>> on the other side a check like:
>>
>> #if SNDRV_CARDS > 32
>> # error to much sound
>> #endif
>>
>> whould give the user a hint what is going on instead of silently ignoring
>> that error.
> 
> SNDRV_CARDS can be more than 32.  That's why the check was
> introduced.
> 

yes of cause, but so far i understand this code will do "continue" if SNDRV_CARDS
is more that 31, no warning.
(warning Start academic discussion):
If anyone ever has more that 31 soundcard he will wonder why 31 are working but the
rest will remain silent. It would be nice to have a idea that there is an internal limit
and it is not sufficient to change  SNDRV_CARDS from 8 to 256. (did i understand the code
correctly ?) and there is no warning.

re,
 wh




More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list