[alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: atmel_wm8904: make it available to choose clock

[Nicolas Ferre]

On 14/01/2014 04:25, Bo Shen :
> Make it available to choose the clock from TK pin or RK pin. This
> is hardware design decided.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen at atmel.com>
> ---
> 
>  sound/soc/atmel/atmel_wm8904.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_wm8904.c b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_wm8904.c
> index b4e3690..b85088d 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_wm8904.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_wm8904.c
> @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static int atmel_asoc_wm8904_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct device_node *codec_np, *cpu_np;
>  	struct snd_soc_card *card = &atmel_asoc_wm8904_card;
>  	struct snd_soc_dai_link *dailink = &atmel_asoc_wm8904_dailink;
> +	struct atmel_ssc_info *ssc_info;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!np) {
> @@ -115,6 +116,15 @@ static int atmel_asoc_wm8904_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	ssc_info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*ssc_info), GFP_KERNEL);

Isn't an atmel_ssc_info structure table already instantiated in
sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c ...
I see, you copy the information contained in this field in the proper
ssc_info of the DAI in the previous patch... Well, isn't it a better way
to pass parameters to the DAI than this one?


> +	if (!ssc_info)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ssc_info->clk_from_rk_pin =
> +		of_property_read_bool(np, "clk_from_rk_pin");
> +
> +	card->drvdata = (void *)ssc_info;
> +
>  	ret = snd_soc_of_parse_card_name(card, "atmel,model");
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to parse card name\n");
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre