[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: simple-card: simplify code
Jean-Francois Moine
moinejf at free.fr
Tue Jan 14 17:12:58 CET 2014
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:20:14 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:36:06PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > This patch
> > - removes the fields of the platform data which are of no use to the
> > non-DT platform callers,
> > - uses a new private structure to handle all the sound card information,
> > - simplifies the code and make easier a possible multi-DAI links extension.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf at free.fr>
> > ---
> > Xiubo, I also removed 'of_device_is_available' which seems really
> > useless: the module is not probed when the DT status is not "okay".
>
> Please send this as a patch series to aid review, one patch doing four
> different changes is much harder to review.
As there are other bugs to fix, I may put back the 'of_device_is_available',
but there are not 3 different changes: I just explain the visible
effects of the patch. The patch itself is, as the subject says,
'simplify code', that is, 'have a simpler code with no change in the
logic'.
> > ret = asoc_simple_card_sub_parse_of(np,
> > - &info->cpu_dai,
> > - of_cpu);
> > + &priv->cpu_dai,
> > + (struct device_node **)
> > + &dai_link->cpu_of_node,
> > + &dai_link->cpu_dai_name);
>
>
> What's this cast here for? That code doesn't look at all safe.
dai_link->cpu_of_node is 'const struct device_node *' and both
of_clk_get() and of_node_put() want 'struct device_node *'. So, there
must be a cast somewhere.
Do you prefer I put these ones when calling the 'of_xx' functions?
--
Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list