[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: Make sure we only build SST drivers on X86

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:21:05PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:

> > But lots of architectures do actually have these operations, I suspect
> > looking at some of the existing users depending on PCI is enough if
> > excessively strict (this will improve build coverage which tends to be
> > useful even if the driver can't be run).

> Yes.  I guess including linux/io.h should fix the build issue.

It should for PowerPC (and ought to be done anyway since an implicit
include is going to break eventually on x86 too) but it won't for
architectures that don't have the function at all.

> Though, limiting the build to X86 isn't bad particularly for this
> driver.

Most people working on ASoC don't build x86 that often, more build
coverage of these minority platforms is going to help avoid issues for
-next! :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20140220/7ae39e88/attachment.sig>