[alsa-devel] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: add dev_to_i915_priv helper

[Imre Deak]

On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 20:40 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 06:42:05PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > This will be needed by later patches, so factor it out.
> 
> The similiar function (for drm_device) is known as to_i915(), so just
> call this dev_to_i915().
> > 
> > No functional change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c  | 15 ++++++---------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  8 ++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > index 71be3c9..32c2e33 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > @@ -923,10 +923,10 @@ i915_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  
> >  static int i915_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> > -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > -	struct drm_device *drm_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev_to_i915_priv(dev);
> > +	struct drm_device *drm_dev = dev_priv->dev;
> >  
> > -	if (!drm_dev || !drm_dev->dev_private) {
> > +	if (!drm_dev || !dev_priv) {
> 
> This test is quite nonsensical since you've dereferenced both pointers
> getting to this point. If it is required, we need a new patch.

Yep, I noticed this after Jani's comment. For now I would just leave
this part unchanged.

> 
> >  		dev_err(dev, "DRM not initialized, aborting suspend.\n");
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> >  	}
> > @@ -939,8 +939,7 @@ static int i915_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >  
> >  static int i915_pm_suspend_late(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> > -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > -	struct drm_device *drm_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct drm_device *drm_dev = dev_to_i915_priv(dev)->dev;
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * We have a suspedn ordering issue with the snd-hda driver also
> > @@ -959,8 +958,7 @@ static int i915_pm_suspend_late(struct device *dev)
> >  
> >  static int i915_pm_resume_early(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> > -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > -	struct drm_device *drm_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct drm_device *drm_dev = dev_to_i915_priv(dev)->dev;
> >  
> >  	if (drm_dev->switch_power_state == DRM_SWITCH_POWER_OFF)
> >  		return 0;
> > @@ -970,8 +968,7 @@ static int i915_pm_resume_early(struct device *dev)
> >  
> >  static int i915_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> > -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > -	struct drm_device *drm_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct drm_device *drm_dev = dev_to_i915_priv(dev)->dev;
> >  
> >  	if (drm_dev->switch_power_state == DRM_SWITCH_POWER_OFF)
> >  		return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index 61a88fa..3de7a55 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -775,6 +775,14 @@ static inline unsigned int intel_num_planes(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> >  	return INTEL_INFO(crtc->base.dev)->num_sprites[crtc->pipe] + 1;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline struct drm_i915_private *dev_to_i915_priv(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > +	struct drm_device *drm_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > +	return drm_dev->dev_private;
> 
> I think you meant 
> 
> static inline struct drm_i915_private *dev_to_i915(struct device *dev)
> {
> 	return to_i915(pci_get_drvdata(to_pci_dev(dev)));
> }

Yes, looks simpler.

> -Chris
>