[alsa-devel] [PATCH 8/8] ASoC: add snd-soc-dummy DT support

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 03:31:44AM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

> > > >If we're already specifying the DAI links for the (D)PCM code it seems
> > > >like we shouldn't also have to put DAPM routes for them in DT as well.

> > > Yes, and I think we shouldn't use anything except for datahsheet pin names
> > > in the devicetree routing, because otherwise we are leaking driver
> > > implementation details.

> It came from snd_soc_of_parse_audio_routing()
> Do you mean this function itself is not good ?

That's intended to be routing analogue pins to each other, not for DAI
links in DPCM - for DAI links we should be getting this information from
elsewhere.

> > While I agree with the sentiment for this when it comes to DAIs we
> > probably want to use the name the interfaces get in the documentation
> > rather than pin names since they involve multiple pins working together.

> Sorry, but what does your "interfaces get in the documentation" mean ?

If the documentation refers to the interface as for example "I2S0" then
the DT should refer to it as I2S0 too.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20140826/1d669a03/attachment.sig>