[alsa-devel] Ordering in soc_pcm_hw_params()

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 02:24:31PM -0400, jonsmirl at gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:

> > That really doesn't solve the problem - consider reparenting for
> > example.

> Maybe it is time to get rid of setsysclk and use the clk
> infrastructure? With the clk stuff the order is known by walking the
> clk dependency chain.

> In my case both sgtl5000 and Allwinner I2S are using clk. But there is
> no mechanism for telling ASOC to use this chain to figure out the
> ordering.

The clock API is not available on all architectures and it *still*
doesn't solve the parenting problems I've repeatedly mentioned.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20140811/acd83670/attachment-0001.sig>