[alsa-devel] Ordering in soc_pcm_hw_params()

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 02:00:22PM -0400, jonsmirl at gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:

> > That's absolutely fine, the clocking arrangements and sequencing
> > requirements for achieving it are in general going to depend on the
> > machine.  The machine may have requirements which mean that it doesn't
> > want to use a clock configuration it's physically possible for it to
> > generate, or it may want to do more extensive reparenting depending on
> > use case.

> We probably need something like EPROBE_DEFER that is used in the
> driver subsystem to allow that various pieces to so this out.

That really doesn't solve the problem - consider reparenting for
example.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20140811/78eb7192/attachment.sig>