[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: bells: Specify REFCLK for FLLs

[Mark Brown]

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:10:18AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Wolfson recommends using a higher frequency REFCLK for best performance
> rather than the default 32kHz reference clock source. We should set a
> good example and do so.

The trick here is of course that MCLK1 is not guaranteed to be
physically present on the board and there are a range of possible
frequencies it could be set to...  I'm not sure I actually have any
crystals.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20130921/ee5c67db/attachment.sig>