[alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: core: Allow DAI links to be specified by using ACPI names

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:23:45PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 10/28/2013 05:06 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> >Indeed.  The way I initially read the suggestion above the idea was to
> >replace the bus number with the ACPI name for the device which seemed
> >sensible but now I reread the bus number is still there.

> Sorry, my textual proposal above was confusing and should have used
> different variables for ACPI name. What I meant was "spix.y" ->
> "spi-INTABCD:ij" and "x-00yz" to "i2c-INTABCD:ij" where "INTABCD:ij"
> was the ACPI device name which contains the device instance in "ij".

Ah, OK - it's actually what I read it as in the first place then!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20131028/85c46fd9/attachment.sig>