[alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/8] ASoC: Add support for virtual switch controls

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:05:53PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:

> What do you mean by 'separate'? Maybe this is was causes the confusion. Do
> you mean a separate DAPM control, like DAPM_SWITCH? That's not what the
> patch does it creates a virtual kcontrol, which can be used to control a
> mixers input. It's the pendant to SOC_DAPM_ENUM_VIRT not to

The issue I'm seeing is that it sounds like this isn't joined up with
the mute control (as it's a virtual control).

> SND_SOC_DAPM_VIRT_MUX. I realize that the commit message may have been a bit
> ambiguous in that regard.

It's the virtual bit that's concerning me here so I don't think that's
really it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20130111/5b659245/attachment.sig>