[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ALSA: hda - Don't be too specific for conflicting boost ctl names

Takashi Iwai tiwai at suse.de
Thu Dec 19 12:21:38 CET 2013


At Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:54:40 +0800,
Raymond Yau wrote:
> 
> When a boost control influences on multiple input paths, we shouldn't
> > pick up the name string specific to one input but rather choose a more
> > generic name.  A problem seen often is that a single mic boost
> > controls both internal and external mics although the driver picks up
> > the very first name randomly like "Internal Mic Boost".  This should
> > have been "Mic Boost", instead.
> >
> > This patch tries to correct that behavior: when a boost control is
> > available, check whether it conflicts with other inputs.  If it does,
> > use a common string ("Mic", "Line") as long as possible, or take a
> > generic name "Input".
> >
> > +
> 
> >                 /* create a boost control */
> > +               if (!conflict) {
> > +                       pfx = spec->input_labels[idx];
> > +                       idx = spec->input_label_idxs[idx];
> > +               } else {
> > +                       pfx = input_type_labels[type];
> > +                       idx = input_type_idxs[type]++;
> > +               }
> > +
> >                 snprintf(boost_label, sizeof(boost_label),
> > -                        "%s Boost Volume", spec->input_labels[idx]);
> > -               if (!add_control(spec, HDA_CTL_WIDGET_VOL, boost_label,
> > -                                spec->input_label_idxs[idx], val))
> > +                        "%s Boost Volume", pfx);
> >
> 
> should "Boost Volume" change to "Boost Capture Volume" if loopback path not
> exist ?

If the loopback doesn't even exist, why to bother?


Takashi


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list