[alsa-devel] [PATCH] hda_intel: Add Oaktrail identifiers
David Henningsson
david.henningsson at canonical.com
Mon Jan 2 21:17:18 CET 2012
On 12/31/2011 06:00 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Thanks, applied.
>>
>> Meanwhile, could you double-check whether AZX_DCAPS_POSFIX_LPIB isn't
>> needed? We have enabled this bit for Poulsbo recently for working
>> around problems regarding the playback positions.
That was my thought as well, but Takashi was quicker, as usual :-)
> Is there a good way to test this and I'll run the test and see.
I wouldn't say we have a really good way to test it; but PulseAudio is
relying heavily on this to be correct. So in short - test both playback
and recording through PulseAudio, and also test making volume changes
while playing back (or recording). If one position fix method is broken,
it usually manifests itself by glitches, audio breaking up, or maybe
stops completely. (There is actually a test tool called alsa-time-test
written by Lennart Poettering, but AFAIK it only tests playback, and I
don't exactly know how to use it.)
A quick way to test different position fix methods is to add this module
parameter:
# This will read from LPIB
options snd-hda-intel position_fix=1
# This will read from DMA Position buffer (the default as specified in
your patch)
options snd-hda-intel position_fix=2
Btw, you seem to be employed by Intel these days? [1] Any chance you can
talk to your firmware developers of this chip? I assume somebody at
Intel should know what method to prefer. That would be the safest/best
option IMHO.
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
http://launchpad.net/~diwic
[1] https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Alan_Cox
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list