[alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ALSA: HDA: Add a new model "asus" for Conexant 5066/205xx

[Andy Robinson]

Tested the backport on an Asus U50F... works fine!

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Andy Robinson <ajr55555 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Certainly, I should be able test it sometime later today. I'll let you
> know the results.
>
> I'm wondering how common this configuration is on Asus systems - that
> is, if the asus model should be the rule for Asus rather than the
> exception for a few specific ones. When I have some free time, maybe
> I'll delve into the alsa-info database to see what's been reported
> there. I suppose it could also be handled generically by checking to
> see if mics are on nodes 0x1a, 0x1b, 0x1c, 0x1d, and/or 0x23, and
> automatically selecting the correct automic logic based on that.
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:43 AM, David Henningsson
> <david.henningsson at canonical.com> wrote:
>> On 2011-01-24 13:52, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>>
>>> At Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:12:39 +0100,
>>> David Henningsson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2011-01-22 17:31, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> At Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:46:00 +0100,
>>>>> David Henningsson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701271
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This new model, named "asus", is identical to the "hp_laptop" model,
>>>>>> except for the location of the internal mic, which is at pin 0x1a.
>>>>>> It is used for Asus K52JU and Lenovo G560.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Henningsson<david.henningsson at canonical.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Applied, but to topic/asoc branch, as these involve rewrites.
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> You mean the topic/hda branch, right?
>>>
>>> Argh, yes, of course...
>>>
>>>> Does this mean it'll not be in 2.6.38, and will it be if I provide a
>>>> backport for the second patch?
>>>
>>> Right.
>>
>> Ok, here's a backport, although untested since I don't have the hardware
>> here. Andy, would it be possible for you to test it for me?
>>
>> --
>> David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
>> http://launchpad.net/~diwic
>>
>