[alsa-devel] Fix section mismatch in wm8995.c

[Takashi Iwai]

At Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:14:11 +0000,
Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 06:48:30PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> > IMO, such a data should be uniquely handled -- either init-only or
> > not.  Through a quick look, snd_soc_cache_sync() may still refer to
> > reg_cache_default.  So, it's still risky to blindly set
> > __devinitconst.  (Yeah, I know it's not used right now, though ;)
> 
> That's a bug in the flat cache, it should be stashing a copy of it in
> the codec instance.

Heh, this is a drawback of keeping such stuff in struct :)

>  Though it only really makes a difference for
> devices where you'd want to use a compressed cache anyway.
> 
> > That is, the data that shall be deleted shouldn't be kept in a
> > structure that might be referred later from other places.
> 
> On the other hand you don't want to make stuff too much of a song and
> dance to use.

True, too.  


Takashi