[alsa-devel] how to mandate the use of PCM plugin?

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:53:49AM +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>  27.09.2010 09:54, Mark Brown wrote:

> >Why not work on fixing the actual problem if it's not already been
> >fixed?

> I am not sure what's the actual fix would
> look like. I wasn't followed the alsa development

I can't really comment since I've no idea what the problem is; if it's
not understood what has gone wrong then some diagnosis will be needed.

> So the question is: can _all_ the plugins be safely
> replaced by the software that opens "hw", or,
> maybe, some are not, and then, they should be
> somehow mandated?

The entire plugin stack is subject to customisation.

> So what the real fix do you think of?

Like I say, I've no idea what the actual problem is so can't really
comment.