[alsa-devel] [patch v2] ALSA: rawmidi: fix the get next midi device ioctl
Takashi Iwai
tiwai at suse.de
Thu Sep 9 08:57:26 CEST 2010
At Wed, 8 Sep 2010 23:29:14 +0200 (CEST),
Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > At Wed, 8 Sep 2010 21:36:41 +0200,
> > Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >>
> >> If we pass in a device which is higher than SNDRV_RAWMIDI_DEVICES then
> >> this function just returns device + 1 which isn't helpful. I've
> >> modified it to return -EINVAL instead.
> >>
> >> Also Smatch complains because the "device + 1" could be an integer
> >> overflow. It's harmless, but we may as well silence the warning.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> V2: In the first version I made negative values return -EINVAL
> >>
> >> diff --git a/sound/core/rawmidi.c b/sound/core/rawmidi.c
> >> index eb68326..1633bac 100644
> >> --- a/sound/core/rawmidi.c
> >> +++ b/sound/core/rawmidi.c
> >> @@ -829,6 +829,8 @@ static int snd_rawmidi_control_ioctl(struct snd_card *card,
> >>
> >> if (get_user(device, (int __user *)argp))
> >> return -EFAULT;
> >> + if (device > SNDRV_RAWMIDI_DEVICES)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > This should be "device >= SNDRV_RAWMIDI_DEVICES".
>
> Also note that this check changes a bit semantics. All other NEXT_DEVICE
> ioctls returns -1 if the value is beyond the last device (meaning no more
> devices were found). So the
>
> if (device == SNDRV_RAWMIDI_DEVICES)
> device = -1;
>
> check should be
>
> if (device >= SNDRV_RAWMIDI_DEVICES)
> device = -1;
>
> ... resulting in one line patch.
But this doesn't work when you pass device = INT_MAX :)
Takashi
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list