[alsa-devel] USB asynchronous mode feedback format
Julian Scheel
julian at jusst.de
Sat Oct 16 18:30:31 CEST 2010
Hi Alex,
Am Samstag, 16. Oktober 2010, 15:58:40 schrieb Alex Lee:
> On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 12:25 +0200, Julian Scheel wrote:
> > Thanks, I implemented them the way same you did. So for get_min/max/cur I
> > always return 48kHz and set_cur simply does nothing.
> > Now playback in general works again. But still the rate feedback seems to
> > have no impact on the data-rate. Also the frequency value shown in
> > proc-interface is unchanged. When rate feedback works, it would probably
> > be slightly different than 48.000kHz?!
>
> OK, you are getting close :-)
I hope so (c:
> One debug technique we have been using is to do a USB wire dump, using
> something like wireshark. This way you can see exactly what goes on
> between the PC host and the device.
Yes, using wireshark is a good idea indeed. And it immediately turns out what
the problem is.
The device sends ISOCHRONOUS out packets on the feedback endpoint (5,
respectively 0x85) - but when I try to send 4 byte, the URB length is always
0. If I only send 3 or less bytes the packets look fine.
I thought it might be a bug regarding max packet size in the at91lib and
raised it to 5, but still only 3 bytes can be send. Any clues what might cause
such an error?
> The other technique is to build a special debug kernel to have copious
> debug messages.
>
> You might want to double check on the EP limitations. Is the feedback
> EP capable of ISO transfer? Are you able to use 4 bytes as the max EP
> size? Is the EP double buffered (required for ISO transfers)? With the
> wireshark dump you will be able to see exactly what is transferred as
> the feedback rate.
Yep, using endpoint 5, which is able to do ISO and has dual bank. It allows up
to 512byte packet size.
> Also, the Max EP size of the ISO OUT data EP should only be one sample
> frame (ie 4 bytes in your case - 16 bits x stereo) bigger than the
> "correct" frame size, ie 192 bytes ====> 196 bytes.
Ok, changed that.
> I looked through your updated USB descriptors and they appear to be
> correct.
Fine, thanks (c:
Regards,
Julian
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list