[alsa-devel] [PATCH 4/7] ASoC: Automatically calculate clock ratio for WM8580

[Jassi Brar]

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 01:36:50PM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
>> For us, having CPU in slave mode is more important than clearing all the
>> use cases perfectly on a _reference_ platform.
>> More so when the 'problem' can be obviously attributed to the h/w design.
>
> Hrm, OK - this is the opposite way around to what most CPU vendors would
> ask for.  Is there any particular reason for this preference?
When CPU MASTER was default, people asked for SLAVE. But nobody asked
for MASTER since we selected SLAVE by default. Both work equally well, it just
saves our efforts.
Btw, I thought CODEC usually provide more accurate signals and hence CPU SLAVE
is better. Is is too wrong?