[alsa-devel] [PATCH 4/4] ALSA: ASoC: Davinci: Fixed missing McBSP pinmux for SFFSDR

[Hugo Villeneuve]

On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:20:15 -0700
Kevin Hilman <khilman at deeprootsystems.com> wrote:

> Hugo Villeneuve <hugo at hugovil.com> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:55:06 -0700
> > Kevin Hilman <khilman at deeprootsystems.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hugo Villeneuve <hugo at hugovil.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:16:32 +0000
> >> > Mark Brown <broonie at sirena.org.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:03:41AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > I based those patches on the latest linux-davinci git tree,
> >> >> > which has the function.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Do not submit patches for mainline which are not based on
> >> >> mainline trees.  Code which relies on out of tree changes needs
> >> >> to wait for those out of tree changes to be merged before
> >> >> submitting to mainline.
> >> >
> >> > I did not know that these changes were not in mainline yet. I was
> >> > told that all davinci ASoC code changes were to be submitted only
> >> > to ALSA, and then were imported back into the davinci git tree.
> >> > Apparently this is not quite like that anymore.
> >> >
> >> > Kevin, what is the new rule to submit davinci ASoC patches?
> >> >
> >> 
> >> The DaVinci ASoC code is indeed in mainline, but not all of the
> >> DaVinci core (in this case the pin mux) is yet in mainline.  I
> >> will be pushing it during the next merge window.
> >
> > That doesn't really answer my question.
> >
> > I can see that David Brownell pushed a patch to the davinci tree
> > directly modifying sound/soc/davinci/davinci-evm.c which IS in
> > mainline. Does this means that as of now all ASoC patches should be
> > sent first to the Davinci list, and then you will push those to the
> > mainline kernel?
> >
> 
> No ASoc patches should be generated against an ASoC tree and submitted
> to alsa-devel, and CC davinci list.
> 
> This means that the until the DaVinci core is in mainline, DaVinci
> git will have slightly different looking ASoC drivers, but those
> changes will be minimal.

Ok, so the patch affecting sound/soc/davinci/davinci-evm.c SHOULD have
been submitted to ALSA first.

It is not easy following you guys. You say something and then do the
opposite.

Hugo V.