[alsa-devel] Timer instability
Lennart Poettering
mznyfn at 0pointer.de
Sun Feb 22 04:14:53 CET 2009
On Sat, 21.02.09 17:36, Takashi Iwai (tiwai at suse.de) wrote:
>
> At Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:34:17 +0100,
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 20.02.09 08:26, Takashi Iwai (tiwai at suse.de) wrote:
> >
> > > > Yes, I am. But ignore that part for now. I have now commented the use
> > > > of that call. Now I certainly get more POLLOUTs as expected, but the
> > > > real problem stays: after a few minutes _avail() will suddenly jump
> > > > from next to zero to more then the hwbuf size in less than 1ms without
> > > > any further inteference and with a buffer size of 350ms! There is
> > > > something really wrong with the behaviour of _avail().
> > > >
> > > > I can reproduce this only on ens1371 for now.
> > >
> > > The ens1371 driver itself is damn simple. The pointer callback just
> > > returns the read value. So, it implies that it's basically a hardware
> > > issue.
> > >
> > > Does the patch below have any influence?
> >
> > No. It doesn't appear to have any effect whatsoever. Still, from time
> > to time the value returned by _avail() is off by once the buffer size,
> > sometimes upwards, sometimes downwards.
> >
> > Moreover I can now reproduce the same issue on snd-intel8x0, albeit it
> > takes more than a couple of minutes to make snd_pcm_avail() return
> > bogus data.
> >
> > Somehow I get the feeling the problem is not so much the inaccuracy of
> > the pointer the kernel reports but in what alsa-libs does ith it.
>
> Hrm... both cases the pointer calculation is relatively simple,
> and for "hw" PCM, the avail calculation is also very straightforward.
> So, my first suspect is about the pointer calculation. But, of course
> we should check all possibilities.
>
> Can you give a small testcase?
Ok, here's a little test case:
http://git.0pointer.de/?p=pulseaudio.git;a=blob_plain;f=src/tests/alsa-time-test.c
I wrote this little test to track down all kinds of timer issues: it
opens and sets up a sound device. Then it will constantly query
_avail(), _delay() and _htstamp() in a busy loop writing a single
sample at a time. The three values are then printed along with a
system timestamp. The data generated like this can be opened in
gnumeric and a nice graph be drawn.
So much about the original purpose of this tool.
The issue in question can be triggered by simply running this tool and
passing the device name as argv[0]. i.e. "alsa-time-test hw:AudioPCI".
The assert at the end of the file (line 189) is triggered when
_avail() starts to become unreliable and jumps around.
For me to reproduce this issue all I have to do is run:
$ alsa-time-test hw:AudioPCI > log
and then wait for a minute or two. The assert is hit the tool aborted.
When that happens one can check the end of 'log' and will see something like this:
<snip>
...
45974071 45974067 45937596 3882 528 4 1 3
45974088 45974084 45937596 3881 529 4 1 3
45974106 45974101 45937596 3880 530 4 1 3
45974122 45974118 45937596 3879 531 4 1 3
45974140 45974136 45937777 3886 524 4 1 3
46025249 45974154 45937777 3885 525 4 1 3
46025279 46025274 45988752 6132 -1722 4 1 3
</snip>
The first column is clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) in us. Second
column in the timestamp stored in the snd_pcm_state_t. The third is
the calculated playback time (i.e. write count - delay). The fourth
column is avail, the fifth is delay.
In the last two lines (i.e. right when the assert aborted us) it
becomes interesting. Suddenly in 30 us, the buffer jumped from an
avail of 3885 to 6132 (buffer size is 4410).
I debugged a little bit through alsa-lib. Apparently in contrast to
what I guessed before this issue seems indeed to be caused by a kernel
bug: the hw_ptr right after the SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_HWSYNC is already
bogus.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list