[alsa-devel] ALSA 1.0.17rc2 release
Jaroslav Kysela
perex at perex.cz
Tue Jun 17 15:23:03 CEST 2008
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:12:06 +0200 (CEST),
> Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > > At Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:42:40 +0200 (CEST),
> > > Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Alan Horstmann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have just confirmed that pasting
> > > > >
> > > > > #define GFP_DMA32 ((__force gfp_t)0x04u)
> > > > >
> > > > > into /alsa-kernel/pci/emu10k1/memory.c (not a correct fix -just taken from
> > > > > 2.6.24 headers) enables build to complete. So there should be no other
> > > > > hidden issues.
> > > >
> > > > Could you try attached patch (also pasted bellow)?
> > >
> > > That's too overhead. A simple #ifndef GFP_DMA32 would work.
> > > And, GFP_DMA32 isn't GFP_DMA.
> >
> > But old kernels with dma_mask < 0xffffffff sets GFP_DMA flag for page
> > allocation. So there's no regression.
>
> GFP_DMA32 means to allocate from ZONE_DMA32 which was a part of
> ZONE_NORMAL.
Yes for 2.6, but 2.4 kernels do not have this flag. The function
pci_alloc_consistent() was used before your patch "[ALSA] emu10k1 -
simplify page allocation for synth" and pci_alloc_consistent() just uses
GFP_DMA flag for page allocation when dma_mask < 32bit. So the result is
same.
I agree that using GFP_DMA is a bit restriction, but I don't have a better
easy solution for 2.4 kernels.
Jaroslav
-----
Jaroslav Kysela <perex at perex.cz>
Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer
ALSA Project, Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list