[alsa-devel] help with idt 92hd206 codec for intel hda?

Tellman, Steven Steven.Tellman at idt.com
Tue Apr 29 20:19:25 CEST 2008


Are you having issues with that board? The 92HD202 has the same ID as
the STAC9221.

 

IDT PC Audio Marketing Engineer/Linux Manager

W: (512) 330-3127

 

From: Nathan Schulte [mailto:reklipz at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:02 PM
To: Takashi Iwai
Cc: Greg Zornetzer; alsa-devel at alsa-project.org; Tellman, Steven;
Matthew Ranostay
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] help with idt 92hd206 codec for intel hda?

 

I recently purchased an ECS A740GM-M Motherboard which has also an IDT
92HD202 integrated audio chipset.

ALSA is recognizing it as a SigmaTel 9221 A2.

I'm willing to test these patches as well as give any information you
guys might need.

-Nate
 
(sorry for any duplicate messages, I'm still trying to get hold of how
this listing thing works...)

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de> wrote:

At Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:48:53 +0200,

I wrote:
>
> At Sun, 27 Apr 2008 01:38:19 -0500,
> Greg Zornetzer wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > I recently acquired an ECS GF7100PVT-M3 motherboard, which appears
to use
> > the IDT 92HD206 codec for HDA.  Unfortunately, it doesn't appear to
have
> > full support under ALSA.  It gets detected as another Sigmatel chip.
Analog
> > stereo output appears to work, but the mixer doesn't find any of the
normal
> > inputs.
> >
> > I found the tech specs for the chip at
> > http://www.idt.com/products/getDoc.cfm?docID=13461840
> > I've attached an lspci output and the codec file to this email.  I'm
not
> > much of an driver hacker, but if someone could give me an idea of
what needs
> > to go into the patch_sigmatel.c file to make this thing work, I'd be
willing
> > to try.  I'm also more than willing to test out patches on my setup.
>
> The below is an entirely untested patch quickly made from the codec
> information you posted.  Could you give it a try with the latest ALSA
> HG version?

Steven informed that this codec is compatible with STAC927x.
So the revised patch below is dramatically shorter.  Try this one
instead of the previous one.



thanks,

Takashi

---

diff -r 19b486f73bd8 pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c
--- a/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c  Fri Apr 25 14:25:04 2008 +0200

+++ b/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c  Tue Apr 29 20:43:43 2008 +0200
@@ -4289,6 +4289,8 @@

       { .id = 0x83847635, .name = "STAC9250D", .patch = patch_stac925x
},
       { .id = 0x83847636, .name = "STAC9251", .patch = patch_stac925x
},
       { .id = 0x83847637, .name = "STAC9250D", .patch = patch_stac925x
},

+       { .id = 0x83847645, .name = "92HD206X", .patch = patch_stac927x
},
+       { .id = 0x83847646, .name = "92HD206D", .patch = patch_stac927x
},

       /* The following does not take into account .id=0x83847661 when
subsys =
        * 104D0C00 which is STAC9225s. Because of this, some SZ
Notebooks are
        * currently not fully supported.
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

 



More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list