[alsa-devel] [PATCH] Fix request_irq error handling

[Ash Willis]

Hah, um, ignore me. It seems that my c needs some work ;)
In if(some_expression), I always though it is true if the expression is > 0, not
!= 0. 
If anything, that was a CodingStyle patch because it lets us see exactly what
we're getting from request_irq but I can see that it is totally unnecessary :)

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ash Willis" <ashwillis at programmer.net>
> To: alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
> Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] Fix request_irq error handling
> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:29:19 -0500
> 
> 
> request_irq returns 0 on success and a negative code on failure.
> Many ALSA drivers incorrectly check for failure by testing for a
> positive code instead of a negative one.
> 
> Signed-Off-By: Ash Willis <ashwillis at programmer.net>
> 
> 
> --
> We've Got Your Name at http://www.mail.com!
> Get a FREE E-mail Account Today - Choose From 100+ Domains
> << request_irq_error_handling.patch >>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

>


-- 
We've Got Your Name at http://www.mail.com!
Get a FREE E-mail Account Today - Choose From 100+ Domains