[alsa-devel] Intel hda ICH7 not worked anymore after using wine

[Tobin Davis]

Patch needs to be applied as follows:


        cd alsa-driver-1.0.14/alsa-kernel
        patch -p1 < LenovoX60S.patch
        cd ..

Then you can rerun configure && make && make install.

Tobin

On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 17:25 +0200, Xavi de Blas wrote:

> 2007/7/9, Tobin Davis <tdavis at dsl-only.net>:
> > Sorry for missing this thread.  I just woke up.
> >
> > I looked at your first pastebin output, and the actual audio codec shows
> > up as 0x51d41981, when it should be 0x11d41981.  This is why the Analog
> > driver patch isn't detecting it.
> >
> > Can you try this patch against alsa-driver-1.0.14?  It should detect
> > this codec.  Still not sure why it is misconfigured, unless there is a
> > bios issue.
> >
> 
> I'm afraid, probably when i tried the Linuxant codecs for the modem it broke the
> bios. Not sure, but sound worked, and continued working some reboots
> later. But when i tried a few things with wine and rebooted, sound
> never worked again
> 
> When i aply the patch (probably i don't do it good) there are problems:
> 
> 
> xavier at corall:/usr/local/src/alsa-src/alsa-driver-1.0.14$ cat
> LenovoX60S.patch | patch -p1
> patching file pci/hda/patch_analog.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 3402.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file pci/hda/patch_analog.c.rej
> 
> 
> xavier at corall:/usr/local/src/alsa-src/alsa-driver-1.0.14/pci/hda$ cat
> patch_analog.c.rej
> *************** struct hda_codec_preset snd_hda_preset_a
> *** 3402,3407 ****
>        { .id = 0x11d41882, .name = "AD1882", .patch = patch_ad1882 },
>        { .id = 0x11d41884, .name = "AD1884", .patch = patch_ad1884 },
>        { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },
>        { .id = 0x11d41983, .name = "AD1983", .patch = patch_ad1983 },
>        { .id = 0x11d41984, .name = "AD1984", .patch = patch_ad1984 },
>        { .id = 0x11d41986, .name = "AD1986A", .patch = patch_ad1986a },
> --- 3402,3408 ----
>        { .id = 0x11d41882, .name = "AD1882", .patch = patch_ad1882 },
>        { .id = 0x11d41884, .name = "AD1884", .patch = patch_ad1884 },
>        { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },
> +       { .id = 0x51d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },
>        { .id = 0x11d41983, .name = "AD1983", .patch = patch_ad1983 },
>        { .id = 0x11d41984, .name = "AD1984", .patch = patch_ad1984 },
>        { .id = 0x11d41986, .name = "AD1986A", .patch = patch_ad1986a },
> 
> 
> The patch is ok?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> (Tobin sorry for sending messge two times)

-- 
Tobin Davis <tdavis at dsl-only.net>