Re: [PATCH 1/6] auxbus: make to_auxiliary_drv accept and return a constant pointer
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 03:50:47PM +0200, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
On 6/11/24 15:01, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
In the quest to make struct device constant, start by making
just curious, how far it will go? eg. do you plan to convert get/put_device() to accept const?
Ugh, that should have said "in the quest to make struct device_driver const", not device. devices obviously can't be constant everywhere as they are dynamically created.
or convert devlink API to accept consts?
Again, sorry, no, typo on my part.
to_auziliary_drv() return a constant pointer so that drivers that call
typo: s/auz/aux/
I'll fix this typo up, and the one above, when I commit it.
this can be fixed up before the driver core changes.
As the return type previously was not constant, also fix up all callers that were assuming that the pointer was not going to be a constant one in order to not break the build.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c index 0f17fc1181d2..7341e7c4ef24 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c @@ -2784,7 +2784,7 @@ static struct ice_pf * ice_ptp_aux_dev_to_owner_pf(struct auxiliary_device *aux_dev) { struct ice_ptp_port_owner *ports_owner;
- struct auxiliary_driver *aux_drv;
- const struct auxiliary_driver *aux_drv; struct ice_ptp *owner_ptp; if (!aux_dev->dev.driver)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c index 47e7c2639774..9a79674d27f1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ int mlx5_attach_device(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) { struct mlx5_priv *priv = &dev->priv; struct auxiliary_device *adev;
- struct auxiliary_driver *adrv;
- const struct auxiliary_driver *adrv;
nit: in netdev we do maintain RCT order of initialization
what does that mean? Nothing is being initialized here.
thanks,
greg k-h
participants (1)
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman