[Sound-open-firmware] Codec Adapters Upstream
Hello All
I know historically there was push back against codec/processing adapters upstream. Now that we have UUID support and the codec adapter, are we still pushing back on this?
Curtis
On 12/16/20 5:09 AM, Curtis Malainey wrote:
Hello All
I know historically there was push back against codec/processing adapters upstream. Now that we have UUID support and the codec adapter, are we still pushing back on this?
Hi Curtis,
Compress interface part on the Linux side is on my table. I don't think
we are pushing back on this it's just I think we are slow on it! :)
Daniel.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:10 PM Daniel Baluta daniel.baluta@nxp.com wrote:
On 12/16/20 5:09 AM, Curtis Malainey wrote:
Hello All
I know historically there was push back against codec/processing adapters upstream. Now that we have UUID support and the codec adapter, are we
still
pushing back on this?
Hi Curtis,
That makes sense, but just to confirm, what about general FX wrappers that are not hardware dependent?
Curtis
Compress interface part on the Linux side is on my table. I don't think
we are pushing back on this it's just I think we are slow on it! :)
Daniel.
Sound-open-firmware mailing list Sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/sound-open-firmware
On 12/16/20 10:57 PM, Curtis Malainey wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:10 PM Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com mailto:daniel.baluta@nxp.com> wrote:
On 12/16/20 5:09 AM, Curtis Malainey wrote: > Hello All > > I know historically there was push back against codec/processing adapters > upstream. Now that we have UUID support and the codec adapter, are we still > pushing back on this? Hi Curtis,That makes sense, but just to confirm, what about general FX wrappers that are not hardware dependent?
I'm afraid I'm not familiar with what FX means. Marcin?
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 12:02 AM Daniel Baluta daniel.baluta@nxp.com wrote:
On 12/16/20 10:57 PM, Curtis Malainey wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:10 PM Daniel Baluta daniel.baluta@nxp.com wrote:
On 12/16/20 5:09 AM, Curtis Malainey wrote:
Hello All
I know historically there was push back against codec/processing
adapters
upstream. Now that we have UUID support and the codec adapter, are we
still
pushing back on this?
Hi Curtis,
That makes sense, but just to confirm, what about general FX wrappers that are not hardware dependent?
I'm afraid I'm not familiar with what FX means. Marcin?
FX is short for "effects" :)
participants (2)
-
Curtis Malainey -
Daniel Baluta