On 2025-04-23 10:28 AM, Philipp Stanner wrote:

The error checks for pcim_iomap() have the function return -EINVAL. -ENOMEM is a more appropriate error code.

Replace -EINVAL with -ENOMEM.

Nitpicks:

I believe the last sentence is redundant, the title and the message say it all.

Next, the suggest scope for the atom-driver is: 'ASoC: Intel: atom:'.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner phasta@kernel.org

sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_pci.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_pci.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_pci.c index eadcf24cbdc3..edc86519816d 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_pci.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_pci.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int sst_platform_get_resources(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx)

ctx->ddr = pcim_iomap(pci, 0, 0);
if (!ctx->ddr)

• 	return -EINVAL;
  

• 	return -ENOMEM;
  
  

  dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "sst: DDR Ptr %p\n", ctx->ddr); } else {

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static int sst_platform_get_resources(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx) ctx->shim_phy_add = pci_resource_start(pci, 1); ctx->shim = pcim_iomap(pci, 1, 0); if (!ctx->shim)

• return -EINVAL;
  

• return -ENOMEM;
  
  

  dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "SST Shim Ptr %p\n", ctx->shim);

@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int sst_platform_get_resources(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx) ctx->mailbox_add = pci_resource_start(pci, 2); ctx->mailbox = pcim_iomap(pci, 2, 0); if (!ctx->mailbox)

• return -EINVAL;
  

• return -ENOMEM;
  
  

  dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "SRAM Ptr %p\n", ctx->mailbox);

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static int sst_platform_get_resources(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx) ctx->iram_base = pci_resource_start(pci, 3); ctx->iram = pcim_iomap(pci, 3, 0); if (!ctx->iram)

• return -EINVAL;
  

• return -ENOMEM;
  
  

  dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "IRAM Ptr %p\n", ctx->iram);

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int sst_platform_get_resources(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx) ctx->dram_base = pci_resource_start(pci, 4); ctx->dram = pcim_iomap(pci, 4, 0); if (!ctx->dram)

• return -EINVAL;
  

• return -ENOMEM;
  
  

  dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "DRAM Ptr %p\n", ctx->dram); return 0;

Hi Philipp,

Thanks for the patch, this is certainly an additional effort, on top of the pcim_xxx one. Couple of nitpicks above but nothing major. Regardless if you decide to address them or not, feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Cezary Rojewski cezary.rojewski@intel.com